Comments on: Why Ad Agencies Use Illustrator Instead of Corel Draw

By: Rosemary Muntus

Rosemary Muntus — Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:41:40 +0000

I use both CorelDraw and Illustrator. There are several places where CorelDraw is the better program especially when working with 2D-grids, with pattern making and some special effects but there are other areas where Illustrator is far superior eg live paint, the width tool and the perspective tool

By: Brooklyn Evans

Brooklyn Evans — Wed, 11 Aug 2010 05:51:53 +0000

Adobe Illustrator has more features than its competitors *

By: Jeprie

Jeprie — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:54:48 +0000

I’m don’t use any of those softwares, Illustrator or Corel. However, I use Photoshop a lot and this push me to learn Illustrator and not Corel. I think many people has same reasons with me.

In my place most people use Corel. Illustrator is not so popular here.

By: Jose Perez

Jose Perez — Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:41:36 +0000

i don’t know with other users but the new version of Adobe illustrator is a bit slower when it loads. *~*

By: Roberto Blake

Roberto Blake — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:17:28 +0000

Jasper I love your passion about this topic and was hoping that someone would put forward a good debate, (yes we know one has been going on for years). It’s good to see someone defend Corel Draw from time to time! I used to use it myself very enthusiastically once upon a time. I think the real truth is that users will have a preference and will in the main rationalize most alternatives as “lesser”, I know that I tend to do that and I will admit that it “may” even be “unfair”. That being said though I will say this, the advantage of using any Adobe product is simply a matter of compatibility and better workflows. There are things that other applications that designers and developers use such as Flash, Flash Catalyst, and InDesign that can do things with an Illustator file that it can’t do with another file type in many cases. So on its own Corel may indeed stand up to Illustrator in every way (though I still have my doubts) but as a tool in an arsenal its less practical. There is also the fact that the cost of having Design Standard, which gives you Illustrator, Photoshop and InDesign, the cornerstones of any designer toolbox, its more expensive to have say Photoshop, Quark, and Corel Draw. So while we have our preferences, you can’t argue pricing and integration. Though every thing else I will agree was well said.

By: Jasper Greek Lao Golangco

Jasper Greek Lao Golangco — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 16:55:57 +0000

I personaly find a lot of amusement from this whole Coreldraw vs. Illustrator debate.
But i am a Coreldraw user and am a graphic design and advertising professional for the past 16 years (www.mavericktheagency.com), and there is NOTHING Illustrator users do that i cannot. and as a very seasoned Coreldraw user, i often accomplish tasks faster than others in my office who i have allowed to use Illustrator.
While I respect your preference for Illustrator, i think it is quite ignorant of you to label Coreldraw as “consumer grade application,” since the quality of the output of both graphic softwares is entirely dependent on the skills of the user.
I am a professional with over a decade and a half worth of experience, and I use CorelDraw.
“Consumer Grade,” my ass…
c’mon, man…

By: Michael

Michael — Thu, 03 Jun 2010 21:39:46 +0000

Let’s be clear here – the ONLY reason Adobe almost has the cornerstone as the industry standard is because they give their software free to all the art schools, so they are in effect brainwashing people to only use their products. While this is genius marketing, it DOES NOT mean their product is better. I have used both and prefer CorelDraw hands down! It’s a much more user-friendly program and everything Illustrator can do, I can do with Corel easier and faster. Corel is not simply a “consumer” software product – it’s a highly comprehensive product that can produce as good as, if not better quality than anything Adobe spews out. And business wise, Adobe will rape you cost-wise when it comes to purchasing licsensing. Everyone that I’ve gotten to use Corel for awhile agrees how much easier and efficient the program is over Illustrator.

By: Harley Marshall

Harley Marshall — Wed, 12 May 2010 17:14:24 +0000

I always use Adobe illustrator at work because i work in an animation studio. this is really a serious tool for the graphic artist.~:;

By: Kuttyjoe

Kuttyjoe — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:49:35 +0000

A very good explanation is simply that Adobe has done better with how they conducted their business. It needs no further explaining than that. Not saying that this is necessarily the case, but I actually believe that is the case. I would also say that I’m getting the idea that Corel has a powerful following in different parts of the world where companies and people are more budget conscious. It makes sense.

By: javier

javier — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 08:47:10 +0000

I’ve used both too, the matter is not what the software does, both have enough tools to create good stuff

I think this is more than the software by itself.

corel is to illustrator like PC is to mac…

you know what I mean….

By: cypherbox

cypherbox — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:02:55 +0000

In my own opinion, I think the reason why Ad agencies use Illustrator instead of Corel Draw. It’s simply because they are fully compatible with Photohop.

By: Roberto Blake

Roberto Blake — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:12:38 +0000

Actually I have used both I and still stand by my statement, though I can respect your opinion, its not elitism if its is not only proven but the excepted standard among the professional community. The Mac argument is a mixed bag of nuts for the simple fact that their are more than enough creatives that use both Mac and PC and that even among PC users Adobe Illustrator is still more widely used than Corel Draw.